Washington Wolf News, Videos, Wolf Plan, Recovery, Reintroduction, Facts, Sightings, Diseases, Attacks, Livestock Predation By Wolves

Home  |  Blog  |  Comments  |  Contacts  |  Diseases  |  Human Attacks  |  Hunting  |  Identification  |  Livestock Attacks  |  Oregon  |  Videos  |  Washington

WASHINGTON

Sightings 1-888-584-9038

Washington Wolf Management

Washington Draft Wolf Plan

Get Wolf Plan Updates

Commission Meeting Schedule

Peer Review - March 2010

 

Current Legal Status

Working Group Named

Methow - Lookout Pack Moves

Wolf Plan Hearings

Okanogan Wolf Howling

Wolf Pair Confirmed

 

Road Killed Wolf

2nd Wolf Pack Confirmed

Who To Contact

Confirmed Wolf Killed Calf

USFWS Verifies Kill

Ranchers Threatened

 

WDFW enforcement Officer Pam Taylor steadies a male gray wolf in Pend Oreille County that has been temporarily sedated so it can be equipped with a satellite radio tracking collar.

 

 

After being fitted with a satellite radio collar, this male wolf will return to his pack.

 

 

Wolves of the "Diamond Pack" in Pend Oreille County.

WOLF RECOVERY

Endangered Species Act

Wikipedia Gray Wolf Description

Rocky Mtn Wolf Recovery Plan

Forest Service FEIS

N Rockies 2008 Annual Report

Is Delisting Rigged

Politics of Wolf Recovery

Wolves In The West

Dr Kay On Wolf Recovery

The Kaibab Deer Incident

Myths, Legends, Misconceptions

3000 Wolves Exist In ID-MT-WY

Rocky Mtn Wolf Recovery Plan

ECOSYSTEMS

Historic Yellowstone Ecosystem

Ecosystem Structures

Restoring Native Ecosystems

LIVESTOCK & PETS

Livestock And Pet Predation

Dealing With Wolf Predation

Montana Livestock Losses

Idaho 2009 Wolf Predation

Wolf Predation 1987-2008

Wolf Predation Candid Photos

Wolf Impact Wisconsin Farms

Wolf Depredation Management

Identify Livestock Depredation

PREDATION

Predator Prey Relationships

Wolf Predation Idaho Elk

Idaho Wolves Hurt Elk Numbers

Wolf Predation More Bad News

Predation On Sheep In Alaska

Cougars Killed By Wolves

Predation On Wintering Deer

DISEASE / PARASITES

Outdoorsman - Hydatid Disease

Warning To Outdoor Users

Synopsis Of Hydatid Disease

Will Graves Warning Letter

Journal Of Wildlife Disease

Wikipedia Hydatid Disease

Echinococcus granulosus

 

Echinococcus multilocularis

Hydatid Cases in US & Canada

Center For Disease Control

World Health Organization

Hydatid Health & Education

Hydatid Cyst Neuro-Surgery

 

Montana Senator Hinkle Letter

Letter to Environmental Council

Infectious Abortions Dairy Cows

Neospora Abortion Dairy Cattle

HUMAN ATTACKS

Human Habituated Wolves

Dr Geist Regarding Wolf Attack

Wolf Attacks On Humans

Review Wolf Attacks Humans

Dr Geist Wolves Dangerous

Dr Geist Wolf Synopsis

Dr Geist Predators And Us

LAWSUITS

Idaho & Montana Wolf Ruling

Great Lakes Wolf Ruling

Tosses Rule For Livestock Kills

Montana Submits Info Lawsuit

Suing Yourself? Tax Dollars

HSUS Accused Racketeering

EXPERTS

Dr David Mech Senior Scientist

Dr Charles Kay Wildlife Biologist

Dr Valerius Geist PhD

Dr Dennis Murray

Mr Will Graves, Retired

Dr Bergerud & Management

George Dovel - Outdoorsman

Wolf Management & Staff

IDAHO

Idaho Wolf Management

Idaho Wolf Management Plan

Idaho F&G Resolution

Idaho Sets Season

Wolf Seasons & Regulations

Tags Go On Sale

Wolf Harvest Tally

MONTANA

Montana Wolf Management

MT Wolf Management Plan

Wolves & Livestock

MT Damage Management

Wolf Re-Imbursement

First Wolf Hunt Preparations

MT Wolf Hunt To Open

Wolf Harvest Tally

WYOMING

Wyoming Wolf Management

WY Wolf Management Plan

Statement Of Reason

Wyoming Emergency Rule

Wyoming Wolf Update

OREGON

Oregon Wolf Management

Oregon Wolf Management Plan

Wolf Spotted In Oregon

Video Of Wolf In Oregon

NEW MEX / ARIZONA

DRAFT Mex Wolf Assessment

Mexican Gray Wolf Recovery

Mexican Gray Wolf Project

Mexican Wolf Captive Mngmt

Fact Sheet For Visitors

Mexican Wolf Removals

Mexican Wolf Program Issues

Wolf Pack Incidents

These Wolves Are Hybrids

WESTERN GREAT LAKES REGION

Great Lakes Wolf Recovery

Michigan Management Plan

Minnesota Management Plan

Wisconsin Management Plan

Addendum To Wisconsin Plan

4,000 Wolves Are Endangered

Assessing The Distinctness

What Animal Is It Now

EASTERN RED WOLF

Wikipedia Red Wolf

Wikipedia Coywolf

Decline, Fall, And Return

Red Wolf Recovery Project

Red Wolf Hybrid Or Not

Red Wolf 5 Year Review

Pennsylvania Coyote/Wolf

CANADA / ALASKA

Wolf Depredation West Canada

Wolf / Bear Hunts Are Helping

Increasing Numbers Of Moose

PRO WOLF

Boomer Wolf Website

California Wolf Center

Defenders Of Wildlife

Humane Society United States

International Wolf Center

Jungle Walk

The Wolf Center

UK Wolf Conservation Trust

Western Wolves

Wolf Haven

Wolf Howl Animal Preserve

Wolf Recovery Foundation

Wolf Web Shop

Wolves Of The World

PRO MANAGEMENT

Abundant Wildlife Society

Black Bear Blogger

Evergreen Magazine

Gray Wolf News

Hunting Washington

Idaho For Wildlife

Lobo Watch

Montanans For Multiple Use

Save Elk

The Outdoorsman

Washington Wolf Info

Western Institute Environment

Wolf Crossing

Wolf Watch

Wolves Gone Wild

OTHER INFO

Are Natives Keystone Predators

Carnivore Conservation

Haliburton Forest Reserve

National Geographic

Science Of Counting Deer

Wolves In Russia

What They Didnít Tell

Wolf Videos

 

Wolf Hunting

 

Wolves and Hunting

By T. R. Mader, Research Director
Abundant Wildlife Society of North America

I'm convinced, based on several years of wolf research, hunters will bear the brunt of wolf recovery/protection regardless of location.

There is no language written in any wolf recovery plan to protect the hunter's privilege to hunt. Wolves are well known to cause wild game population declines which are so drastic hunting is either eliminated or severely curtailed. And there is no provision for recovery of wild game populations for the purposes of hunting. It simply will not be allowed.

Example: A few years ago, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) agreed the state should take over the responsibility of wolf management. The DNR felt wolves were impacting their deer populations and wanted to open a short trapping season on the wolf.

The environmentalists sued and won. The USFWS could not give wolf management back to Minnesota in spite of a desire to do so.

The problem with wolf recovery is that most people, especially hunters, have not looked "beyond press releases and into the heart of the wolf issue."
It must be stated clearly that the wolf is the best tool for shutting down hunting. The anti-hunters know this. Most hunters don't. Thus, wolf recovery is not opposed by the people who will be impacted most.

In order to understand the impacts wolves have on hunting, let's look at some biological factors of the wolf and compare some hunting facts.

The wolf is an efficient predator of wild game and domestic livestock. Due to its ability as a predator, the wolf was removed from areas of the U.S. where man settled. There is no such thing as peaceful coexistence between man and wolf - one has to give to the other since both prey/hunt the same wildlife/ungulate populations.

Did the removal of the wolf cause it to become endangered? No, there are 40,000 to 60,000 wolves on the North American continent. The animal is doing quite well. During the years of wolf control, the wolf's territory was eliminated throughout most of the lower 48 states. That factor is the reason the wolf is on the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

A wolf requires five to ten pounds of meat per day for survival, thus the wolf requires a considerable amount of meat in one year - nearly a ton of meat per year per wolf. A wolf is capable of consuming great quantities of meat, up to one fifth of its body weight, at one time. Thus, a wolf does not have to kill each day to survive.

Wolves hunt year around - 365 days a year. Wolf predation is not limited to two weeks, one month or whatever a hunting season length may be, it is year around.

Wolves are opportunistic hunters, meaning they kill what is available and convenient. For years, hunters have been fed the line, "Wolves kill only the weak, sick and old." Worse yet, hunters have believed it.
It is true, wolves do kill old animals, but so do hunters. Those are the big bulls or bucks prized by many who hunt. In fact, biological studies have shown wolves kill older male animals more than any other adult member of a wild game population.

Regarding sick animals, there are not many sick wild animals today. Hunters and trappers are directly responsible for healthy wild game herds today.
In the cyclic "balance of nature" of years past (no hunting by man), ungulate populations would thrive until they overgrazed their habitat and starved. This malnutrition made ungulate populations susceptible to disease. Consequently, disease was more common. Lewis and Clark wrote of such herds. (The other major factor contributing to the decline in wildlife populations was predation.)

Hunting controls this cycle so that herds are kept at proper levels for habitat, preventing malnutrition and susceptibility to disease. Hunting dollars went to habitat improvement and biological studies which, in turn, help maintain healthier herds of ungulates.

Even agriculture plays a part in the dispersal of salt and other minerals to domestic livestock. Wild animals access these nutrients as well. Thus, disease is not as rampant as when nature regulates it naturally. It is also interesting to note that where disease is a problem today, such as Yellowstone National Park, hunting is not allowed.

Trapping completes the cycle of game management by controlling the predator. The predator is to wildlife what weeds are to a garden. They must be controlled or they will take over. Additionally, predators are disease carriers. Some people are aware predators carry rabies since reports of rabid animals or some person being bitten by a rabid animal are often in the news, but few realize predators also carry other deadly diseases, i.e. raccoons carry a deadly fowl cholera. And finally, trapping benefits the predator by keeping their numbers in check. This keeps the population healthy. If predators do overpopulate, they become more susceptible to rabies, mange and other diseases.

Wolves do not eat sick animals unless forced to do so. We have found this true in many cases.

Example: A Conservation Officer for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) found a moose with brain worm. Brain worm completely destroys an animal's instinctive and natural behavior. This moose had wandered out on a frozen lake in winter and was slowly starving to death. Wolves came by, checked the moose out and went their way. Tracks in the snow verified it. They did not kill it even though it would have been extremely easy to do so.

Wolves do kill the weak. Weak animals are not sick animals, they are simply the "less strong" of the herd. Wolves target these animals - the young and pregnant - due to their inability to escape. This is an important factor in limiting wildlife population numbers. Wolves prey directly on the recruitment and reproductive segments of ungulate populations.

While doing research in British Colombia, a wolf biologist from the British Colombia Ministry of Environment took the time to show me how wolves could impact hunting so severely. Here's his example.

In this particular example he used a number of 300 females in a herd of elk. In his region, wolf predation is often 90% on the young (100% mortality rates due to predation are common in the north). If 300 females gave birth in an area of wolves, the approximate loss would be about 270 young calves killed during the summer months, leaving 30 yearlings to serve as replacements. A regular die-off rate on such a herd is about 10%. So the 30 yearlings would balance out the regular mortality rate of the female segment of the herd.
But overall there is a decline in the elk herd due to the fact that the 30 yearlings are usually sexually split in half (15 females and 15 males), thus the reproductive segment of the herd declines although the numbers appear to balance out. Without some form of wolf control, the rate of decline will increase within a few years.

There were approximately 100 males in this herd of elk. Figuring the regular mortality rate and compensating with the surviving young leaves 5 animals (males only) that could be harvested by man.

Now if this herd of elk were in an area of no wolves, there would be approximately 60 - 70% successful reproduction (calves making it to yearlings) or 200 young. Half of those surviving young would be male (100 animals). After figuring a 10% mortality rate, 90 older animals could be harvested without impact to the overall herd numbers. In fact, the herd would increase due to additional numbers of the reproductive segment (females) of the herd.

Now you have some insight of the impacts wolves can have on hunting.
In spite of the negative publicity generated by the anti-hunting, anti-trapping movements, hunting and trapping are some of the best wildlife management tools.

Hunters' harvest can be limited through numbers of licenses issued, bag limits, length of seasons, and specification of sex of the animal harvested. Thus, only the surplus of an ungulate population is generally hunted. If the need arises that an ungulate population needs reduction, it is easily accomplished by allowing an "any sex" hunt and increasing license numbers. Additionally, hunters will pay for the opportunity to hunt which in turn pays for wildlife management.

Wolves do none of the above. They simply kill to survive and for the sake of killing. Studies have shown that ungulate populations cannot withstand hunting by man and uncontrolled predation by wolves for any length of time. One has to give to the other. In this day and age, the wolf will be the winner, the hunter the loser.

A point which should be stressed is "wolves kill for the sake of killing," not just to survive. Many are convinced wolves kill only what they need to eat. That simply isn't true.

Remember the moose with brain worm the wolves didn't eat? In the same area, the same winter and only a couple of months later, the same Conservation Officer followed two wolves after a spring snow storm and found the wolves had killed 21 deer. Only two were partially eaten.

The snow gave the wolves the advantage. These deer were autopsied and many were found to be pregnant. The total number of deer killed in 2 days by these 2 wolves was 36.

Such incidents of surplus killing are common. For example, Canadian biologists came upon an area where a pack of wolves have killed 34 caribou calves in one area. Another example came from Alaska. In the Wrangell Mountains, a pack of five wolves came upon 20 Dall rams crossing a snow-covered plateau. All 20 rams were killed by the wolves. Only six were partially eaten by the wolves.

Dr. Charles E. Kay, PH.D. has lectured on the impacts of wolf recovery. To illustrate the impacts of wolves on hunting, he did a comparison of moose populations in British Colombia versus Sweden and Finland. Both areas have a comparable amount of moose habitat.

Dr. Kay stated, "During the 1980s in Sweden and Finland, the pre-calf or the wintering population of moose was approximately 400,000 animals and was increasing. While in British Colombia, it was 240,000 animals and decreasing.

"In British Colombia where they have a population of 240,000 animals and after a calving season they killed only 12,000 animals which is a 5% off take. In Sweden and Finland, on the other hand, they have 400,000 moose and guess how many they killed in the fall? They killed 240,000 moose in the fall which is a 57% off take rate.

"Now the two main differences, I don't want to imply that there's not vegetation difference and other things, but the two main differences is that British Colombia has somewhere between 5,000 and 6,000 wolves, all sorts of bears, grizzly bears and black bears which are also important predators, and mountain lions. Sweden and Finland have none of the above."

Veteran wolf biologist, John Gunson, Alberta Ministry of Environment, summed it up when he said, "Really, there isn't any room for harvest by man if you have a healthy wolf population."

Hunters, please understand the impacts of wolf recovery on hunting and the role wolf recovery plays in the anti-hunters' agenda. Natural predation, especially wolf predation, can replace your privilege to hunt.

 
Copyright 1991 - Permission granted copy this article in its entirety with proper credit given to the source.
 
T. R. Mader is Research Director for Abundant Wildlife Society of North America (AWS), a private wildlife research organization dedicated to the preservation of the Great North American Traditions of Hunting, Fishing and Trapping.

 

 

 

 

Mongolian Wolf Hunting Video

Hunting wolves with a golden eagle in Mongolia, KazajstŠn, and Kyrgyzstan. These wolves can be hunted this way because they are  more the size of a coyote, much smaller than North American wolves.

 

 

First wolf taken on 2009 Idaho Hunt

 

Wolf taken in Idaho 2009

 

First Idaho County Wolf


Idaho  
         Oct 1, 2009


Opening day of Wolf season in Elk City and Dworshak Zones, Dad and I headed out to our blind in "Secret Meadows".  We reached the meadow at 6:45am, parked the 4 wheelers, 50 yards from the blind, and walk out to the blind in the middle of the meadow. We got settled in and I range-found 4 or 5 different spots for dad then turned to watch my sector. No sooner than I got relaxed I caught some movement out the corner of my eye. I said "Shit there's a wolf" turned around and we both aimed in on him. He walked  in the middle of the meadow stepped up on a small knoll looked at a couple "moo cows" and started to let out a howl. Dad and I counted down 3......2.....1 and bang I hit him next to his right eye and dad hit him center of the chest. Dropped him cold. Time was 7:00am.

I have also attached a few pics of him that we caught on our trail camera......

 

Trail Cam photo of the Idaho Wolf

 

Preparing to skin the Idaho Wolf

Lack Of Fear

Skinner was correct. The areas of Asia where wolf attacks occur on humans are the same areas where people have no firearms or other effective means of predator control.

 

Successful Idaho Gray Wolf Hunt

 

Idaho Gray Wolf, Feb 2010

 

Dog In Back Yard Killed By Wolves

 

Why Hunt Wolves

 

Comparing the number of wolf-human and wolf-livestock conflicts in areas where wolves are regularly hunted verses areas where wolves are seldom hunted, it is easy to conclude that hunting reinforces wolves fear of humans and ranching operations. Therefore a hunted population of wolves is far likelier to co-exist in today's human occupied landscapes.

 

 

Please send news links, stories and information, or your comments to:    info@graywolfnews.com

Home  |  Blog  |  Comments  |  Contacts  |  Diseases  |  Human Attacks  |  Hunting  |  Identification

Livestock Attacks  |  Oregon  |  Videos  |  Washington

Copyright © 2010 Gray Wolf News

 

  Vote for Us at The Outdoor Lodge's Top Hunting Sites Fins and Fur  - The best of Hunting and Fishing